IGS Realty Co. v. James Catering, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
As a result of tenants’ inability to obtain substitute counsel within 13 days of prior counsel being relieved by the court, tenants and Brady, their principal, have been deprived of their day in court in four cases: the Civil Court proceedings brought by the IGS Realty, the Supreme Court actions between tenants and
Tenants’ cross motion for leave to amend the complaint in index No. 650463/09 should have been granted. The motion court erred in finding that tenants failed to furnish a proposed amended complaint. Furthermore, the proposed fraud claim was sufficiently specific (see Pludeman v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 10 NY3d 486, 491 [2008]).
Brady’s contention that he is entitled to summary judgment in IGS Realty’s action on his guarantees is unavailing. He failed to preserve his claim that the guarantees are unenforceable as unconscionable and there are issues of fact as to whether IGS Realty failed to perform its obligations to tenants. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.