Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 7, 2012

100 A.D.3d 610; 953 N.Y.S.2d 298

Cases that cite this one

20 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. O'Keefe (New York County Court, Warren County 2025)
People v. O'Keefe (New York County Court, Warren County 2025)
People v. Manning (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
People v. Bonds (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
People v. Carman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Daniel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Barrott (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
People v. Lima-Sanchez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
People v. Marquez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
People v. Holmes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
People v. Anderson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
People v. Correnti (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
People v. Woods (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
People v. Watson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
People v. Watson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
People v. Baluja (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
People v. Baluja (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

— Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), dated December 16, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the assessment of 15 points under risk factor 11 (Drug or Alcohol Abuse-History of Abuse), was supported by clear and convincing evidence. Specifically, based upon the case summary and probation report *611relied upon by the hearing court (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Lewis, 37 AD3d 689 [2007]), the defendant had a history of substance abuse, and further, the defendant had admitted that his marijuana use may have caused him to commit one of the underlying offenses (see People v Robinson, 55 AD3d 708 [2008]). Additionally, the assessment of 10 points under risk factor 13 (Conduct while confined/supervised-Unsatisfactory) was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The defendant’s unsatisfactory conduct during his incarceration was established by the case summary, which revealed that he recently committed a tier III disciplinary violation (see People v Mabee, 69 AD3d 820, 821 [2010]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sexually violent offender. Florio, J.E, Dickerson, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.