People v. Randolph
People v. Randolph
101 A.D.3d 482; 954 N.Y.2d 868
Opinion of the Court
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.