Lynn & Cahill, LLP v. Witkin
Lynn & Cahill, LLP v. Witkin
101 A.D.3d 515; 954 N.Y.2d 879
Opinion of the Court
In response to plaintiffs motion for a default judgment, defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for failing to file an answer (see e.g. Toure v Harrison, 6 AD3d 270, 271 [1st Dept 2004]). Rather, the record suggests that defendant’s inaction constituted a tactical decision on the part of herself and counsel. Nor did defendant demonstrate a meritorious defense to the action.
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Clark, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.