Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

Strauss v. Saadatmand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 20, 2012

101 A.D.3d 573; 955 N.Y.2d 513

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Kim (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*574We do not perceive any “exigent circumstances” warranting disturbance of the modified interim award (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 63 AD3d 493, 496-497 [1st Dept 2009], appeal dismissed 14 NY3d 921 [2010]). The motion court properly directed the parties to supplement their motion papers with updated financial statements (see CPLR 2214 [c]). In any event, however, the motion court did not base the upward modification in interim child support on the parties’ updated financial information; it based the modification on the “substantial change in circumstances” represented by the reduction in defendant’s interim visitation schedule from two to three days per week to one two-hour supervised visit per week (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b] [2] [i]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.