Williams v. Town of Greenburgh
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Alamin v. Uddin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Alamin v. Uddin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Kabir v. Vanderhost (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Kabir v. Vanderhost (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, through competent medical evidence, that the plaintiffs condition did not result from the subject accident (see Scott v Martinez, 99 AD3d 984 [2012]; Enyah v Sherpa, 98 AD3d 993 [2012]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was conclusory on the issue of whether the plaintiffs condition was the result of the subject accident (see Barry v Future Cab Corp., 71 AD3d 710 [2010]; Piperis v Wan, 49 AD3d 840 [2008]). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion should have been granted. Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.