Juhasz v. Juhasz
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Gustafson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Iskalo Elec. Tower LLC v. Stantec Consulting Servs., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Calabrese Bakeries, Inc. v. Rockland Bakery, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- MURTAUGH, GAIL v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs motion seeking the difference between pendente lite support paid during the pendency of the divorce action and the amounts of maintenance and child support that were ultimately awarded. Plaintiff’s contentions concerning retroactive support “were previously raised and decided against [her] or could have been raised on a prior appeal in this matter . . . ‘Therefore, reconsideration of these [contentions] is barred by the doctrine of law of the case’ ” (Matter of Suzuki-Peters v Peters, 37 AD3d 726 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 814 [2007], quoting Palumbo v Palumbo, 10 AD3d 680, 682 [2004], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 765 [2004]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Carni and Valentino, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.