Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013

HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M.

HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 7, 2013
HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M.

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department CA 12-01221 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

RICHARD HOTALING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER CHARLES M. SPROCK, ESQ., ROBERT F.

BALDWIN, JR., ESQ., JAMIE L. SUTPHEN, ESQ.

AND BALDWIN & SUTPHEN, LLP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, SYRACUSE (NICOLE MARLOW-JONES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (LAURENCE F. SOVIK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered September 15, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the third amended complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: June 7, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.