Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013

MUNN, JEREL J., PEOPLE v

MUNN, JEREL J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 26, 2013
MUNN, JEREL J., PEOPLE v

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department KA 11-01651 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JEREL J. MUNN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID PANEPINTO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M.

Wolfgang, J.), rendered June 21, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that Supreme Court fulfilled its duty of advising defendant that the promised sentence included a mandatory period of postrelease supervision (see generally People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 244-245), and we therefore reject defendant’s further contention that his plea was not knowing and voluntary. The record establishes that “the plea represent[ed] a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to defendant” (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403; see People v Cornell, 16 NY3d 801, 802).

Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.