In re Alice D.
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs payable by the nonparty-respondent, and the motion of George Brucker for “reimbursement of legal fee[s]” incurred in defending the federal action is denied.
The Supreme Court was without authority to grant the motion of George Brucker, made in the instant guardianship proceeding in which he is not a party, for “reimbursement of legal fee[s]” incurred in defending a federal action, as the federal action was not “before the court” within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (a). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the motion. Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.