People v. Sanchez
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Long (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Finnegan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Finnegan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court failed to conduct a hearing or adduce sufficient evidence to determine the amount of restitution imposed is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant failed to request a hearing or otherwise challenge the amount of restitution imposed at sentencing (see People v Winslow, 100 AD3d 1031 [2012]; People v Toomer, 61 AD3d 899, 900 [2009]). In any event, since the defendant agreed to the amount of restitution imposed as part of a plea agreement, the Supreme Court did not err in imposing restitution in the sum of $62,640 without conducting a hearing (see People v Winslow, 100 AD3d 1031 [2012]; People v Toomer, 61 AD3d at 900). Dillon, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.