People v. Sanchez
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court failed to conduct a hearing or adduce sufficient evidence to determine the amount of restitution imposed is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant failed to request a hearing or otherwise challenge the amount of restitution imposed at sentencing (see People v Winslow, 100 AD3d 1031 [2012]; People v Toomer, 61 AD3d 899, 900 [2009]). In any event, since the defendant agreed to the amount of restitution imposed as part of a plea agreement, the Supreme Court did not err in imposing restitution in the sum of $62,640 without conducting a hearing (see People v Winslow, 100 AD3d 1031 [2012]; People v Toomer, 61 AD3d at 900). Dillon, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.