In re Omari W.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from order
Appellant challenges the dispositional order, asserting that the court should have granted his request for a third adjournment of the dispositional hearing. Since appellant has completed his placement, and since he does not challenge the juvenile delinquency adjudication, this appeal is moot (see e.g. Matter of Rene A., 34 AD3d 223 [2006]). In any event, the denial of the adjournment was a proper exercise of discretion under the circumstances presented, and the placement was the least restrictive dispositional alternative. Concur — Sweeny, J.E, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam, Román and Feinman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.