People v. Lopez
Opinion of the Court
We reject defendant’s argument that his robbery and burglary convictions were against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence established that defendant stole the victim’s cell phone, that he did so by force rather than as an afterthought following an assault, and that he unlawfully entered the victim’s apartment building by threatening an occupant.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.