Schraub v. Schraub
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York
Defendant’s bare, conclusory assertion of his inability to pay the support obligation was insufficient to warrant a hearing (Farkas v Farkas, 209 AD2d 316, 317-318 [1st Dept 1994]). Although given ample opportunity by way of a briefing schedule set by the court, defendant failed to cross-move for a downward modification, submit an affidavit setting forth his alleged inability to pay, or oppose plaintiffs motion by requesting a hearing on his inability to pay. Thus, defendant failed to raise any issue of fact requiring a hearing on his alleged inability to pay (id.). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.