People v. Aller
Opinion of the Court
— Appeal by the de
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not violate the Double Jeopardy and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Pemberton, 93 AD3d 681 [2012]; People v Mills, 90 AD3d 1076 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; People v Algarin, 89 AD3d 859 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.