McNeil v. Fischer
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
We confirm. Substantial evidence, in the form of the misbehavior reports and petitioner’s testimony, supports both determinations (see Matter of Costa v Connolly, 94 AD3d 1322, 1322 [2012]; Matter of Law v Goord, 301 AD2d 703, 704 [2003]). We perceive nothing inherently contradictory in the first determination that petitioner’s behavior, while violative of facility count procedures, did not delay the count or interfere with the officer as he conducted it. Petitioner’s remaining argument, that the officer proffered both misbehavior reports in retaliation for the filing of a grievance, was not raised at either hearing and is therefore not properly before us (see Matter of Bookman v Fischer, 107 AD3d 1260, 1260 [2013]; Matter of Latham v Taylor, 80 AD3d 1044, 1044 [2011]).
Peters, EJ., Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.