Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014

People v. Ramsay

People v. Ramsay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided August 20, 2014 · Eng, Skelos, Leventhal, Roman, Duffy
120 A.D.3d 719; 990 N.Y.S.2d 891; 2014 NY Slip Op 05902; 2014 WL 4085854; 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841
People v. Ramsay

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), both imposed July 19, 2010, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, PJ., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.