Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Pera]

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Pera]
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 11, 2014 · Peters, Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy, Garry
120 A.D.3d 1483; 991 N.Y.S.2d 920; 991 N.Y.S.2d 921; 2014 NY Slip Op 06144; 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6111
MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Pera]

Opinion

*1484 Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by the First Department in 1997, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.