Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014

Matter of Jasmine A. (Albert G.--Sabrina A.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 23, 2014 · No. 13002 13001 · Mazzarelli, Renwick, Andrias, Richter, Feinman

120 A.D.3d 1125; 992 N.Y.S.2d 417

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Matter of Brittany W. v. Miles-Gustave (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
Matter of Taveon J. (Selina T.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
Matter of Taveon J. (Selina T.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
Matter of Niveyama C-T. (Antwon C-T.--Antoinette C-T.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
Matter of Niveyama C-T. (Antwon C-T.--Antoinette C-T.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
Matter of Serina C. (Ishmael M.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
Matter of Gabriel J. (Stacey J.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Matter of Serenity H. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Matter of Madison M. (Nathan M.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about August 12, 2013, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that respondent father neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence {see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]). The record shows that respondent repeatedly allowed the mother to return to the family home despite his awareness of the mother’s history of drug use and the history of domestic violence. Additionally, respondent permitted the mother to return to the home in violation of an existing order of protection (see Matter of Diamond Tyneshia B. [Aisha K.], 109 AD3d 740 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 855 [2013]).

The children’s out-of-court statements regarding the mother’s history of violence against respondent, were cross-corroborated by each others’ statements, by their statements to petitioner agency’s caseworkers, and by respondent’s own statements (see Matter of Alex R. [Maria R.], 81 AD3d 463 [1st Dept 2011]; Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Renwick, Andrias, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.