Matter of William M. v. Elba Q.
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Jose M.R. v. Arian S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Jose M.R. v. Arian S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Tatyana G. v. Keith C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Matter of Tatyana G. v. Keith C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Matter of Brooke A.D. v. Rajiv D. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Matter of Brooke A.D. v. Rajiv D. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Matter of Atiya D.K. v. Curtis J.C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Matter of Yenis C. v. Daniel R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Matter of Jolanda K. v. Damian B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Jasmine E.C. (Gabriel J.C.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Martha B. v. Julian P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Order of protection, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about May 2, 2012, against respondent, after a fact-finding determination that respondent committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree, menacing in the third degree, and disorderly conduct, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A fair preponderance of the evidence supports Family Court’s finding that respondent committed the offenses of harassment in the second degree, menacing in the third degree, and disorderly conduct (see Family Ct Act § 832). Petitioner’s testimony that respondent attempted to stab him with a knife pulled from her coat pocket, causing him to become afraid and run away, supports the court’s determination that respondent committed harassment in the second degree and menacing in the third degree (Family Ct Act § 821 [1]; Penal Law §§ 120.15, 240.26 [1]; Matter of Tamara A. v Anthony Wayne S., 110 AD3d 560 [1st Dept 2013]; Matter of Denzel F., 44 AD3d 389, 390 [1st Dept 2007]). Moreover, petitioner testified that respondent wielded the knife in the stairwell of an apartment building and that on another occasion, while petitioner and his son were standing outside their apartment building, respondent shouted obscenities at the son from a sixth-floor window, which supports the court’s determination that respondent committed the family offense of disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [1], [3]; see e.g. Matter of Miriam M. v Warren M., 51 AD3d 581 [1st Dept 2008]; see also Tamara A. v Anthony Wayne S., 110 AD3d at 560).
We find no basis for disturbing the court’s determination crediting petitioner’s version of events over respondent’s version (see Matter of Peter G. v Karleen K., 51 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2008]).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.