Matter of Kaydance H. G. (Carmen M.)
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Nay'amya W.R. (Kiara D.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Angel M.R.J. (Rachel R.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- In re R.M. Catholic Guardian Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Lierre J.M. (Melissa L.D.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Maximus K.B. (Orlando B.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Matter of James T. L. (Robert L.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals (1) from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated October 1, 2013, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, inter alia, found that she permanently neglected the child and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 7, *631 2013, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, inter alia, terminated her parental rights.
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined, based on clear and convincing evidence, that the mother permanently neglected the subject child by failing, for one year following the child’s placement into foster care, to plan for her return (see Matter of Todd Andre’D. [Kenyetta L.], 88 AD3d 876 [2011]; Matter of Kendra D. [Amanda D.], 81 AD3d 644 [2011]; Matter of Wesley F., 190 AD2d 576 [1993]). The evidence at that fact-finding hearing established that the petitioner made diligent efforts to help the mother comply with her service plan. At the time the instant petition was filed, the mother still had not found suitable housing or planned for the return of the child. The court also properly determined that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Todd Andre’D. [Kenyetta L.], 88 AD3d at 876; Matter of Kendra D. [Amanda D.], 81 AD3d at 645; Matter of Shawna DD., 289 AD2d 892, 894 [2001]).
Contrary to the mother’s contention, she was afforded the effective assistance of counsel in the Family Court (see Matter of Darrell W. [Tenika C.], 110 AD3d 1088 [2013]; Matter of Dylan Me. [Michelle M. Mc.], 105 AD3d 1049 [2013]).
The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.