People v. Pokuwaah
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions that certain testimony was improperly admitted at trial are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024 [1995]). In any event, her contentions are without merit (see People v Reid, 19 NY3d 382, 388 [2012]; People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 422 [1986]).
The defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Mastro, J.P, Dickerson, Lott and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.