Schwartz v. Kings Third Avenue Pharmacy, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J), entered January 8, 2013, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when she allegedly tripped and fell over a display rack in the aisle of de
In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to her argument that the display rack was placed at the end of the aisle such that she did not have sufficient time to perceive it upon turning into the aisle, the evidence, including her testimony, shows that the rack was located at least several feet into the aisle (compare Westbrook v WR Activities-Cabrera Mkts., 5 AD3d 69 [1st Dept 2004]; Robinson v 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp., 82 AD3d 735 [2d Dept 2011]). Moreover, plaintiff stated that she noticed the rack before the accident, and her expert’s affidavit fails to raise a triable issue, and was conclusory and speculative (see e.g. Vazquez v JRG Realty Corp., 81 AD3d 555 [1st Dept 2011]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, DeGrasse, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.