People v. Thorne
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered May 16, 2013, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
To the extent that the defendant’s claim that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently entered rests on matter outside the record on appeal, it may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Smith, 85 AD3d 1065 [2011]; People v Steven B., 81 AD3d 843 [2011]; People v Griffith, 78 AD3d 1194 [2010]). To the extent that this claim is based on matter appearing on the record, it is not preserved for appellate review since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea (see People v Steven B., 81 AD3d at 843; People v Bunn, 79 AD3d 1143 [2010]; People v Nowell, 46 AD3d 707 [2007]). In any event, the claim is without merit.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.