Smith v. Kelly
Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondents, dated February 4, 2013, which
Respondents’ determination is supported by substantial evidence (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]), including petitioner’s admissions that she lied to federal agents conducting a drug trafficking investigation.
The penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience in that petitioner was found to have engaged in serious misconduct, and admitted other less serious charges committed during her short career as a police officer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.