Matter of James v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Ramirez v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of McClain v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Jones v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Ramos v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Matter of Sandy v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, violent conduct and creating a disturbance as a result of an altercation with another inmate. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
While a review of the hearing transcript demonstrates that the Hearing Officer was often ill-mannered and lacking in professional decorum, we nonetheless confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony from the correction officer who investigated the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fernandez v Fischer, 110 AD3d 1422, 1422 [2013]; Matter of Leslie v Fischer, 107 AD3d 1264, 1265 [2013]). Testimony from *1538 petitioner and other inmate witnesses that petitioner was not involved in the incident created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Fernandez v Fischer, 110 AD3d at 1423; Matter of Mitchell v Bezio, 69 AD3d 1281, 1281-1282 [2010]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.