Bullock v. Alhadeff

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered November 21, 2013, which denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss the breach of contract counterclaims for lack of standing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On this CPLR 3211 motion, the court correctly concluded that, liberally construed, the counterclaims for breach of contract do not demonstrate conclusively that defendant was not a party to the contracts at issue and therefore has no standing to sue on them.

We have considered all other issues raised and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Richter and Gische, JJ.