Matter of Teanna P. v. David M.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Abusikin v. City of New York (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Ritchie v. Ritchie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Matter of KC B. Mench v. Majerus (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Matter of Dawn DD. v. James EE. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (David Gilman, J.H.O.), *655 entered on or about December 16, 2014, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition for an order of protection and vacated a temporary order of protection, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court properly determined that petitioner failed to prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent’s alleged conduct established a family offense (see Matter of Rafael F. v Pedro Pablo N., 106 AD3d 635 [1st Dept 2013]). Petitioner alleged that respondent walked by her apartment building when she was in the front yard and stared at her in a way that made her feel scared and intimidated. She also asserted that respondent came to a store where she was, walked up to within two feet of her and called her a derogatory name. Even accepting these allegations as true, they do not support a determination that respondent’s conduct constituted either harassment in the second degree or disorderly conduct (see Matter of Christine P. v Machiste Q., 124 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2015]; Penal Law §§ 240.26, 240.20). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.