Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015

FOSTER, CANDIE A. v. FOSTER, ANDREW J.

FOSTER, CANDIE A. v. FOSTER, ANDREW J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 1, 2015
FOSTER, CANDIE A. v. FOSTER, ANDREW J.

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department CAF 13-01932 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF CANDIE A. FOSTER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANDREW J. FOSTER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PAUL M. DEEP, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

COHEN & COHEN LLP, UTICA (RICHARD A. COHEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

JOHN J. RASPANTE, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered October 11, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner mother appeals from an order denying her petition, following a hearing, seeking to modify a prior custody order that, inter alia, granted primary physical custody of the subject child to respondent father. “A party seeking a change in an established custody arrangement must show a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child” (Matter of Gross v Gross, 119 AD3d 1453, 1453 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Contrary to the mother’s contention, we conclude that Family Court’s determination that she failed to meet that burden has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Rauch v Keller, 77 AD3d 1409, 1410).

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.