Powers v. Doar
Opinion of the Court
Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner committed the charged acts of misconduct (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]). The record shows that petitioner engaged in a pattern of aggressive and inappropriate workplace conduct, and there exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations made by the Administrative Law Judge (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.