Martinez v. Annucci
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Guadalupe v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Matter of Frantz v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- MILLS, RASHEEN v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONY J. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Lyons v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Green v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Green v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Mills v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Mills v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Mills v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Smith v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Corp v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Williams v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Belle v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Wade v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Ball v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Cotterell v. Taylor-Stewart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was ordered to submit a urine specimen for testing and it twice tested positive for the presence of three different substances, namely, buprenorphine, THC 50 and K2-2. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance and also with using an intoxicant. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges and the determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation, as well as the hearing testimony, provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of using a controlled substance
Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.