People v. Taylor
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Soto (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), dated April 25, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s application for a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]). The defendant failed to demonstrate the existence of a mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the SORA Guidelines that warranted a downward departure from his presumptive risk level designation (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]; People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Nowicki, 133 AD3d 732, 732-733 [2015]; People v Shelton, 126 AD3d 959, 960 [2015]).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.