People v. Azeez
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Rodriguez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Webb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Cepeda (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Findley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Grabowski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Armstrong, J.), dated August 4, 2014, which designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the People’s contention, this appeal from an order designating the defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C should not be dismissed on the ground that the defendant has been deported (see People v Shim, 139 AD3d 68 [2d Dept 2016]; People v Edwards, 117 AD3d 418 [2014]; People v Gudino-Sanchez, 116 AD3d 565 [2014]; People v Scott, 113 AD3d 491 [2014]).
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level two designation. A defendant seeking to establish a downward departure has the burden of identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, and establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, facts in support of the identified mitigating factor. The defendant failed to meet this burden with respect to any of the alleged mitigating factors upon which he relies (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Correnti, 126 AD3d 681 [2015]).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.