Matter of Ballard v. Racette
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Concepcion v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of DeBerry v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Young v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Young v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Simmons v. Kirkpatrick (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Mitchell v. Department of Corrections & Community Supervision (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Kirshtein v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Haigler v. Chappius (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Macedonio v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Haigler v. Chappius (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Haigler v. Chappius (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Robinson v Prack, 137 AD3d 1452, 1452 [2016]; Matter of Mercer v Stallone, 137 AD3d 1408, 1408 [2016]).
Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.