Matter of Davis (Commr. of Labor)
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Williams (Commissioner of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Matter of Tracy (Commissioner of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Watts (Commissioner of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Matter of Page (Commissioner of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Alford (Commissioner of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 13, 2015, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.
By decision dated August 18, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ), among other things, sustained an initial determination finding that claimant was ineligible to receive emergency unemployment compensation benefits and charging her with a recoverable overpayment of benefits. Claimant did not appeal the ALJ’s decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board until June 14, 2015. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely, noting that claimant did not set forth any excuse for the delay. Claimant appeals.
“Labor Law § 621 (1) provides that an appeal to the Board from a decision of an ALJ must be made within 20 days of the mailing or personal delivery of the decision, and this time requirement is strictly construed” (Matter of Buchkin [Commissioner of Labor], 115 AD3d 1107, 1108 [2014] [citations omit *1308 ted]; see Matter of Paladino [Commissioner of Labor], 140 AD3d 1496, 1496-1497 [2016]). Claimant clearly did not appeal within the statutory time period and offered no excuse for the delay. As such, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision (see Matter of Stephens [Commissioner of Labor], 119 AD3d 1258, 1259 [2014]). Accordingly, the merits of the underlying determination are not properly before us (see Matter of Padilla [Commissioner of Labor], 136 AD3d 1080, 1081 [2016]; Matter of Matteo [Commissioner of Labor], 134 AD3d 1307, 1307 [2015]).
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.