People v. Urrego
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Linares (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- People v. Mahar (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- People v. Morrison (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), dated January 23, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In this proceeding under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq.), insofar as relevant to this appeal, the Supreme Court assessed the defendant 30 points under risk factor 3 (“Number of Victims”). In determining that the defendant had three victims, the court relied on the defendant’s plea of guilty as to one victim and grand jury testimony from two additional victims. We find no basis to *924 overturn the court’s determination that the grand jury testimony admitted in this case constituted clear and convincing evidence supporting the assessment of 30 points under risk factor 3 (see People v Carleo, 82 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2011]; cf. People v Tubbs, 124 AD3d 1094, 1094 [2015]; see generally People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 572 [2009]; People v Wells, 138 AD3d 947, 950 [2016]). Accordingly, the court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.