Matter of Bomba
Cases that cite this one
164 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Matter of Keene (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Wasserman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Crayne (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
- Matter of McGill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Patterson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Yatong Ju (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Davidstoltz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Hornsby (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Virgona (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Accili (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of McCann (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Takemoto-Gentile (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Gilmartin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Fluh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Pinsky (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Majtan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Santomauro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Ramnitz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Pearlman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Matter of Tobin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Matter of Steinbaum (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Matter of Janger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Matter of Chatinover (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Gould (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Odom (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Margaret Alice Bomba was admitted to practice by this Court in 2010 and lists a business address in Boston, Massachusetts with the Office of Court Administration. By affidavit sworn to August 4, 2016, Bomba now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes Bomba’s application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.
Bomba’s application must be denied. Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 each require that attorneys admitted to practice in New York file a biennial registration statement, and attendant fee, with the Office of Court Administration. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) directly states that the failure to duly register “shall constitute conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and shall be referred to the appropriate appellate division . . . for disciplinary action” (see Benjamin v Koeppel, 85 NY2d 549, 556 [1995]; see also Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1 [h]). Further, the Rules of Professional Conduct explicitly define conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice as attorney misconduct (see Rules of Professional *1227 Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]), and this Court has repeatedly and consistently held that failure to comply with the registration requirements is professional misconduct warranting discipline (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 113 AD3d 1020, 1021 [2014]; Matter of Arms, 251 AD2d 743, 743-744 [1998]; Matter of Ryan, 238 AD2d 713, 713-714 [1997]; Matter of Farley, 205 AD2d 874, 874-875 [1994]).
As noted by AGC, Bomba has failed to abide by the attorney registration requirements for three consecutive biennial periods beginning in 2012. Accordingly, we find that she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and deny her application. We further hold that any future application by Bomba for leave to resign for nondisciplinary reasons must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1.
Ordered that Margaret Alice Bomba’s application to resign is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.