Fishoff Family Foundation v. Frydman
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gowen v. Helly Nahmad Gallery, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- E.E. Cruz & Co., Inc. v. Starr Surplus Lines Ins. Co. (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered October 22, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Insofar as relevant here, to be liable for sanctions, a party or attorney must knowingly submit or sign pleadings or papers containing materially false statements of fact (Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1 et seq.). Whether to impose sanctions, even in such a case, is left to the discretion of the court (see e.g. Weisburst v Dreifus, 89 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2011]). Here, plaintiffs stated that they relied on prior counsel for the allegations raised in the complaint after counsel’s investigation. Given that many of the facts in the complaint were a matter of public record, and that defendants never deposed prior counsel or otherwise established that he lacked a good faith basis for the allegations, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.