Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017

People v. Urena

People v. Urena
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 19, 2017 · Eng, Hall, Cohen, Lasalle, Connolly
2017 NY Slip Op 3022; 149 A.D.3d 985; 50 N.Y.S.3d 298
People v. Urena

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), rendered March 31, 2014, as amended September 29, 2014 (Zaro, J.), convicting him of attempted sodomy in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit (see CPL 30.10 [3] [f]; L 1996, ch 122, § 1).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Cohen, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.