Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017

People v. Faulkner

People v. Faulkner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 20, 2017 · Friedman, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, Gesmer
2017 NY Slip Op 5051; 151 A.D.3d 601; 55 N.Y.S.3d 249
People v. Faulkner

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 20 points under risk factor 13 for unsatisfactory conduct while confined, based on an incident where he sexually harassed a nurse (see People v Birch, 99 AD3d 422 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 854 [2012]). In any event, without those points, defendant would remain a level three offender because of both his point score and the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, and there is no basis for a downward departure. The mitigating factors cited by defendant are outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying offense (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]).

The court properly designated defendant a sexually violent offender because he was convicted of an enumerated offense, and it lacked discretion to do otherwise (see People v Bullock, 125 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 915 [2015]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.