Matter of Pagnani v. Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Estate of Gerhardt Wise v. New York State Dept. of Health (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
- Matter of Mangels v. Zucker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Matter of Schaffer v. Zucker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Matter of Mills Pond Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr. v. New York State Dept. of Health (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Anand v. New York State Dept. of Health (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Matter of Hill v. Zucker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Matter of Medford Multicare Ctr. v. Zucker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York dated May 18, 2015, which, after a fair hearing pursuant to Social Services Law § 22, upheld a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services dated September 12, 2014, that the petitioner was ineligible for Medicaid benefits due to her failure to submit proper documentation.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
In reviewing a Medicaid eligibility determination made after a fair hearing, the court must review the record, as a whole, to determine if the agency’s decisions are supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Bosco v McGuire, 111 AD3d 931, 932 [2013]). “Substantial evidence means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact. The petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating eligibility” (Matter of Loiacono v Demarzo, 72 AD3d 969, 969-970 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]).
Here, the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York that the petitioner did not establish good cause for her failure to provide in a timely manner documents necessary for the processing of her application for Medicaid benefits is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Bosco v McGuire, 111 AD3d at 932; Matter of Frohlinger v DeBuono, 278 AD2d 323, 324 [2000]).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.