People v. Forde

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shil-lingford, J.), rendered December 10, 2013, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and menacing in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*853 The defendant’s contention that the admission of certain evidence violated his constitutional right to confrontation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Liner, 9 NY3d 856, 856-857 [2007]; People v Castro, 149 AD3d 862 [2017]), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to reach this contention.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.