Matter of Liquidation of Midland Ins. Co.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered July 13, 2016, which confirmed the report of a Referee, dated December 10, 2015, disallowing claimant from asserting certain excess insurance claims in the New York liquidation proceeding for Midland Insurance Company because the issues have already been fully litigated in a previous action in Minnesota, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Supreme Court and the Referee properly found that the subject claims are barred by res judicata and collateral estop-pel, based on prior rulings in Minnesota on the same claims and issues (see Spectris Inc. v 1997 Milton B. Hollander Family Trust, 138 AD3d 626 [1st Dept 2016]; Bruno v Bruno, 83 AD3d 165 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 805 [2012]; Hauschildt v Beckingham, 686 NW2d 829, 840 [Minn 2004]).

We have considered claimant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.