Santillo v. Santillo
Opinion
| Santillo v Santillo |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 08156 |
| Decided on November 17, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 17, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
1354 CA 17-00292
v
THOMAS J. SANTILLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY L. TURNER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BILGORE, REICH & KANTOR, LLP, ROCHESTER (THEODORE S. KANTOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (James J. Piampiano, J.), entered November 7, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for, inter alia, leave to renew his prior motion to vacate the qualified domestic relations order entered in February 1996.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Santillo v Santillo ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 17, 2017]).
Entered: November 17, 2017
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.