Matter of Palmisano v. Mattice
Matter of Palmisano v. Mattice
2018 NY Slip Op 1761
Opinion
Matter of Palmisano v Mattice (2018 NY Slip Op 01761)
Decided on March 16, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.
256 CAF 16-01815
| Matter of Palmisano v Mattice |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 01761 |
| Decided on March 16, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 16, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.
256 CAF 16-01815
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH M. PALMISANO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
BRIANA ELIZABETH MATTICE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
v
BRIANA ELIZABETH MATTICE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
LINDA M. CAMPBELL, SYRACUSE, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
DOUGLAS M. DEMARCHÉ, JR., NEW HARTFORD, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (William W. Rose, R.), entered September 21, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the cross petition of petitioner for modification of a prior custody and visitation order.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Mattice v Palmisano ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Mar. 16, 2018] [4th Dept 2018]).
Entered: March 16, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.