Matter of Komarek v. Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex
Matter of Komarek v. Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex
2018 NY Slip Op 2989
Opinion
Matter of Komarek v Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex (2018 NY Slip Op 02989)
Decided on April 27, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
470 CA 17-01455
| Matter of Komarek v Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 02989 |
| Decided on April 27, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 27, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
470 CA 17-01455
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW R. KOMAREK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, TOWN BOARD OF MIDDLESEX AND TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
v
PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, TOWN BOARD OF MIDDLESEX AND TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD (VIVEK J. THIAGARAJAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Yates County (W. Patrick Falvey, A.J.), entered December 1, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, among other things, denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: April 27, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.