Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018

Rickicki v. Borden Chem.

Rickicki v. Borden Chem.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 8, 2018
2018 NY Slip Op 4259
Rickicki v. Borden Chem.

Opinion

Rickicki v Borden Chem. (2018 NY Slip Op 04259)
Rickicki v Borden Chem.
2018 NY Slip Op 04259
Decided on June 8, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 8, 2018
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ. (Filed June 8, 2018.)
MOTION NO. (1098/17) CA 15-02155.

[*1]PATRICIA A. RICKICKI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID P. RICKICKI, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

BORDEN CHEMICAL, DIVISION OF BORDEN, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, UNIMIN CORPORATION AND U.S. SILICA COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) MICHAEL C. CROWLEY AND SHARON M. CROWLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, C-E MINERALS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, UNIMIN CORPORATION, UNIMIN SPECIALTY MINERALS, INC., MEYERS CHEMICALS, U.S. SILICA COMPANY, MALVERN MINERALS COMPANY, FERRO CORPORATION, NYCO MINERALS COMPANY AND CHARLES B. CHRYSTAL CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 1.)


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motions for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and other relief denied.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.