Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018

People v. Perry

People v. Perry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 13, 2018
2018 NY Slip Op 4352
People v. Perry

Opinion

People v Perry (2018 NY Slip Op 04352)
People v Perry
2018 NY Slip Op 04352
Decided on June 13, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 13, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-05816
(Ind. No. 20/17)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Timothy Earl Perry, also known as "Dog," appellant.




Thomas N. N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, NY (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered May 3, 2017, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-340, 341-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256; People v Calvi, 89 NY2d 868, 871) precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.