Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018

People v. Muicela

People v. Muicela
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 17, 2018
2018 NY Slip Op 6943
People v. Muicela

Opinion

People v Muicela (2018 NY Slip Op 06943)
People v Muicela
2018 NY Slip Op 06943
Decided on October 17, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 17, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-11030
(Ind. No. 453-15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Louis Muicela, appellant.




Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Elizabeth Miller of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Fernando Camacho, J.), imposed December 15, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096; People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341โ€”342; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.